Free Royalty Images Biography
Source(google.com.pk)Lady Diana Frances Spencer, (July 1, 1961–August 31, 1997) was the first wife of Charles, Prince of Wales. From her marriage in 1981 to her divorce in 1996 she was called “Her Royal Highness The Princess of Wales”. After her divorce from the Prince of Wales in 1996, Diana ceased to be the Princess of Wales and also lost the resulting Royal Highness style.
After her divorce, officially, she was called Diana, Princess of Wales.
Diana was often called Princess Diana by the media and the public, but she did not possess such a title and was not personally a princess, a point Diana herself made to people who referred to her as such. Contrary to belief, being Princess of Wales does not make one a princess in one’s own right. It merely indicates that one was married to a Prince of Wales.
An iconic presence on the world stage, Diana, Princess of Wales was noted for her pioneering charity work. Yet her philanthropic endeavours were sometimes overshadowed by her difficult marriage to Prince Charles. In the 1990s she made many public revelations about the difficult marriage – her affairs and Prince Charles’ affair with Camilla Parker-Bowles.
From the time of her engagement to the Prince of Wales in 1981 until her death in a car accident in 1997, the Princess was arguably the most famous woman in the world, the pre-eminent female celebrity of her generation: a fashion icon, an image of feminine beauty, admired and emulated for her high-profile involvement in AIDS issues, and the international campaign against landmines. During her lifetime, she was often referred to as the most photographed person in the world.
Diana Frances Spencer was born as the youngest daughter of Edward Spencer, Viscount Althorp, and his first wife, Frances Spencer, at Park House on the Sandringham estate. On the death of her paternal grandfather, Albert Spencer, 7th Earl Spencer, in 1975, Diana’s father became the 8th Earl Spencer, and she acquired the courtesy title of The Lady Diana Spencer and moved from her childhood home at Park House to her family’s sixteenth-century ancestral home of Althorp. A year later, Lord Spencer married Raine, Countess of Dartmouth, the only daughter of the romance novelist Barbara Cartland, after being named as the “other party” in the Earl and Countess of Dartmouth’s divorce.
Diana was educated at Riddlesworth Hall in Norfolk and at West Heath Girls’ School (later reorganized as the New School at West Heath, a special school for boys and girls) in Sevenoaks, Kent, where she was regarded as an academically below-average student, having failed all of her O-level examinations. In 1977, aged 16, she left West Heath and briefly attended Institut Alpin Videmanette, a finishing school in Rougemont, Switzerland (Diana’s future husband was also dating her sister, Lady Sarah at that time). Diana was a talented amateur singer, excelled in sports and reportedly longed to be a ballerina.
Diana’s family, the Spencers, had been close to the British Royal Family for decades. Her maternal grandmother, Ruth, Lady Fermoy, was a longtime friend of, and a lady-in-waiting to Queen Elizabeth the Queen Mother.
The Prince’s love life had always been the subject of press speculation, and he was linked to numerous women. Nearing his mid-thirties, he was under increasing pressure to marry. In order to gain the approval of his family and their advisors, including his great-uncle Lord Mountbatten of Burma, any potential bride had to have an aristocratic background, could not have been previously married, should be Protestant and, preferably, a virgin. Diana fulfilled all of these qualifications.
Reportedly, the Prince’s former girlfriend (and, eventually, his second wife) Camilla Parker Bowles helped him select the 19-year-old Lady Diana Spencer as a potential bride, who was working as an assistant at the Young England kindergarten in Pimlico. It was at this kindergarten school that the famous iconic snap of a 19-year-old Lady Diana Spencer was taken by John Minihan with the morning sun to her back, her legs in silhouette through her skirt.
Buckingham Palace announced the engagement on 24 February 1981. Mrs. Parker Bowles had been dismissed by Lord Mountbatten of Burma as a potential spouse for the heir to throne some years before, reportedly due to her age (16 months the Prince’s senior), her sexual experience, and her lack of suitably aristocratic lineage.
Wedding of Prince Charles and Princess Diana
The wedding took place at St Paul’s Cathedral in London on Wednesday 29 July 1981 before 3,500 invited guests (including Mrs. Parker Bowles and her husband, a godson of Queen Elizabeth the Queen Mother) and an estimated 1 billion television viewers around the world.
Diana was the first Englishwoman to marry the heir to the throne since 1659, when Lady Anne Hyde married the Duke of York and Albany, the future King James II (although, unlike Charles, James was heir presumptive and not heir apparent). Upon her marriage, Diana became Her Royal Highness The Princess of Wales and was ranked as the third most senior royal woman in the United Kingdom after the Queen and the Queen Mother.
The Prince and Princess of Wales had two children, Prince William of Wales on 21 June 1982 and Prince Henry of Wales (commonly called Prince Harry) on 15 September 1984.
Princess Diana – Break up of Marriage with Prince Charles
In the mid 1980s her marriage fell apart, an event at first suppressed, but then sensationalised, by the world media. Both the Prince and Princess of Wales allegedly spoke to the press through friends, accusing each other of blame for the marriage’s demise. Charles resumed his relationship with Camilla Parker Bowles, whilst Diana became involved with James Hewitt and possibly later with James Gilbey, with whom she was involved in the so-called Squidgygate affair. She later confirmed (in a television interview with Martin Bashir) the affair with her riding instructor, James Hewitt. Another alleged lover was a bodyguard assigned to the Princess’s security detail, although the Princess adamantly denied a sexual relationship with him. After her separation from Prince Charles, Diana was allegedly involved with married art dealer Oliver Hoare and rugby player Will Carling. She did publicly date heart surgeon Hasnat Khan before becoming involved with Dodi Fayed.
The Prince and Princess of Wales were separated on 9 December 1992; their divorce was finalised on 28 August 1996. The Princess lost the style Her Royal Highness and instead was styled as Diana, Princess of Wales. However, since the divorce, Buckingham Palace has maintained that Diana was officially a member of the Royal Family, since she was the mother of the second and third in line to the throne.
Princess Diana Charity work
Starting in the mid-to-late 1980s, the Princess of Wales became well known for her support of charity projects, and is credited with considerable influence for her campaigns against the use of landmines and helping the victims of AIDS.
In April 1987, the Princess of Wales was the first high-profile celebrity to be photographed knowingly touching a person infected with the HIV virus. Her contribution to changing the public opinion of AIDS sufferers was summarised in December 2001 by Bill Clinton at the ‘Diana, Princess of Wales Lecture on AIDS’, when he said:
“In 1987, when so many still believed that AIDS could be contracted through casual contact, Princess Diana sat on the sickbed of a man with AIDS and held his hand. She showed the world that people with AIDS deserve no isolation, but compassion and kindness. It helped change world opinion, and gave hope to people with AIDS with an outcome of saved lives of people at risk.“
Prince Waldemar, the eldest son of Prince and Princess Henry of Prussia, "was recently attacked by a serious throat trouble," according to a special dispatch from Berlin to the New York Times. A specialist was summoned to treat the young prince. The doctor decided "that an operation was necessary," and "this has been successfully performed."
Prince Waldemar is nine years old.
King Albert and Queen Elisabeth of the Belgians and their eldest son, Crown Prince Leopold, arrived in Paris today, where they "received a hearty welcome," reports the New York Times.
Their train was decorated with Belgian and allied flags, and reached the Bois de Boulogne station at 2 p.m.
There were crowds along the entire route, despite the "dull and gray"weather.
King Albert was dressed in the uniform of a Belgian General. Crown Prince Leopold wore a "private's uniform," Queen Elisabeth wore a "tan-colored coat with a gray fur collar and a ton toque." She sat next to Madame Poincaré in an open carriage, and "smiled happily as women and children in the throngs threw flowers into the carriage."
The Royal family traveled to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, and then went to the Elysee Palace to pay their respects to French President Poincare. Tonight they are attending a reception for the Belgian community and diplomatic corps the d'Orsay Palace, which will be followed by a dinner at Elysee Palace.
Queen Fabiola, consort of the late King Baudouin of the Belgians, died tonight at
Château du Stuyvenberg. She was 86 years old.
Leurs Majestés le Roi et la Reine et les Membres de la Famille Royale annoncent avec une très grande tristesse le décès de Sa Majesté la Reine Fabiola, survenu ce soir au Château du Stuyvenberg à Bruxelles.
The court proceedings between Hereditary Count Ludwig zu Waldburg zu Wolfegg und Waldsee and Indonesian celebrity Jessica Iskandar has entered a new phase, according to a new article in the Indonesian press. (I use Google translate so I am not sure how accurate this is.)
The article says Ludwig either wants or is challenging the request for DNA testing to prove that he is the father of Jessica's infant son, Barack Alexander.
Jessica's attorney told reporters that they welcome the DNA testing. The testing can be done only if Ludwig is willing to return to the country. (He is said to be in Singapore.) Jessica believes that the tests will prove that Ludwig is the father of her son .. and proof of their relationship together.
Iskandar's lawyer also said that they have the evidence to prove that the marriage is valid, and will refute Ludwig's arguments. The Hereditary Count has filed a suit, asking for an annulment of the marriage record, stating that the marriage is false and never took place. Jessica Iskandar's lawyer will prove that the marriage certificate is valid.
Queen Frederika of Greece visited Princeton University earlier today, reports the New York Times. She was accompanied by her daughter, Princess Sophia. They and two members of their entourage spent most of today "shuttling" between the campus, the James Forrestal Research Center and the Institute for Advanced Study.
At the Forrestal Research Center, the Queen "displayed a knowledge of high-energy physics by asking pertinent questions about the experimental nuclear fission devices."
She and Princess Sophie had lunch with the president of the university, and toured Nassau Hal.
Tonight, the Queen and Princess Sophie are having dinner with Dr. J. Robert Oppenheimer, director of the Institute for Advanced Study. Dr. Oppenheimer is the former adviser to the Atomic Energy Commission.
Princess Juliana of the Netherlands lost a "valuable bracelet" at the wedding of the Duke and Duchess of Kent, reports the Associated Press.
Hugo Haase, the People's Commissioner for Foreign Affairs at Berlin, told a correspondent of The Express that "the German Government is still undecided as to how to deal with the former Emperor and the Hohenzollerns. I think they may be sufficiently punished by the international odium they have incurred."
According to the New York Times, the new German Government has "consented to permit a number of Hohenzollern princes" to leave the country on the condition that "they leave their fortunes behind them." They have "accepted the conditions" and most plan to leave for Switzerland, Denmark or Holland."
Prince August Wilhelm, the former Kaiser's fourth son, and his wife, Alexandra Viktoria, are making plans to go to Argentina, "as soon as possible."
Former Empress Auguste Viktoria has "apparently recovered from her recent indisposition," and has been seen walking with her husband on the grounds of the castle at Amerongen.
It is also being reported, "on good authority," that the former Empress "contributed largely" to her husband's decision to abdicate his throne. Her "confidential informants gave an unrosy account" of the political situation in regards to the throne.
Emperor Nicholas II has left the front, reports the New York Times. He will be returning to "various towns in central and southern Russia," to visit the wounded soldiers who are recuperating in hospitals.
Crown Prince Alexander II about the reasons for non-participating in the celebration of the centennial of the beginning of the Great War in Serbia and his relations with the government
Maybe I am the problem for the government
I am disappointed with the lack of respect for my ancestors, government don’t even invite me. There is a terrible violation of human rights of my family and me, which should be solved. Fact that we’ve got monument to the Russian Emperor Nicholas the Second before the monument for the rulers of Serbia is very interesting, and also sad.
This year has been very important for our history, but I found that Serbia has not had much opportunity to see what my ancestors – King Peter I Liberator and Alexander I Unifier did 100 years ago, although they are very important people in our history. My grandfather was the supreme commander of the Serbian army. I did not see his name even at the exhibition “1914” at the Historical Museum. I am disappointed because of this lack of recognition. Almost every member of Karadjordje’s dynasty personally participated in the Great War, and each of the descendants of the Supreme Leader is a part of the iconostasis of our national being and our historical consciousness – says Crown Prince Alexander. In an interview for the “Danas” he speaks about the centennial of the beginning of the First World War in Serbia, relations with the current government, position and circumstances of the Royal Family, whose head he is.
Has Serbia marked worthily and in the right way the Balkan Wars and the beginning of the First World War, which formally started by bombing of the Belgrade by Austro – Hungarians?
More could have been done the ideas existed for a long time, but implementation was invariably done at the last minute. There were parts of history missing and lack of more coverage and acknowledgment for what you mention in your question. Unfortunately, it is not in the interest of some people for our true history to be known, they still stick to its cleansed version.
Why were you not seen in the ceremonies in Serbiat hat marked the centennial of the outbreak of the Great War and the famous battles?
I did not receive the invitation. Not even for marking the Battle of Cer, which is sad, because many of our people respect what my grandfather did. I could not lay my wreath. I complained to the authorities, but there was no effect. The second case was marking 80 years since the assassination of King Alexander in Marseilles. The French were very correct. When they found that I am not in the Serbian delegation, they organized our arrival at the airport we were met by a representative of the French government. The French government is socialist, but has a lot of respect for my family.
What do you say about the City officials’ proposal that monuments of Kings Peter I and Alexander I should be erected in Belgrade. Have you been consulted regarding that?
I heard about it last week from the City of Belgrade. I fully support and encourage monuments for King Peter I and King Alexander I. It is about time. There is a spectacular monument in Paris to the two kings, I would be thrilled and very proud if there was such a magnificent monument in a nice location in Belgrade. I think they should not be at the end of the world. The fact that we’ve got the monument to the Russian Emperor Nicholas the Second before the monuments to the rulers of our blood is very interesting,but also sad. I think that my grandfather and my father should get their streets in Belgrade soon, too.
Why didn’t you come to consecration of the monument to Emperor Nicholas and what are your ties and connections with Russia?
Nice monument. I don’t recall being invited and in any case it was at the last minute and I had obligations set well in advance abroad. I have good ties with Russia and will always remember a superb memorable lunch my wife and I had in the Kremlin as guests of President Vladimir Putin, Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev. Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov and the Russian Patriarch.
Why has the evaluation of King Alexander’s personality, his state, military and foreign policy not yet come out of the cliché, which was set, according to historians, by “the communists and political enemies”?
There are a few individuals who still feel uncomfortable when it comes to our uncensored history, but I am certain with more openness and time things will become clearer and much more open. I want to mention that when I came to live in the Royal Compound I kept all the symbols of the past and there are many referring to our communist past. Only dictators cleanse history.
Is such an attitude towards King Alexander I, especially in Serbia, the price of his forcing of the Yugoslav idea?
That was the deal with everyone after the Treaty of Versailles, and there were pressures from the West. The Kingdom of the Serbs, Croats and Slovenes, and later the Kingdom of Yugoslavia was the solution for the time,without which we would have another war. Ethnic map of the former Yugoslavia was described as “leopard skin”,which showed a remarkable diversity. Now this map isethnically very clean everywhere, except in Serbia,especially in Croatia and Bosnia. What happened to people’s lives, their homes and property, was really shocking. It was complete madness. When we came here13 years ago, we had over 500 thousand refugees. We need to know what happened in the past, to avoid repetition of such situations in the future. Our obligation is to respect all religions and all ethnic origins, which is supported by the Patriarch, the dignitaries of other religious communities and politicians who advocate humanrights and dialogue. Now we are standing at the door of the European Union and we are showing that we respecteveryone, regardless of ethnic origin or religion.
Recent exhibition at Historical Museum of Serbia “In the name of people” and controversial reaction in the public again opened questions whether the civil war among the Serbs is over. What do you think about that and who finally have to deal with national reconciliation?
What happened in the period this exhibition shows was shocking. It mainly dealt with Serbia, but it in fact reflected what happened throughout the former Yugoslavia. It is a pity few people visited this exposition. The civil war is over, but getting to know what happened “in the name of people” will never be over. With education, jobs and more free media a lot will be revealed about our past. There must be national reconciliation and there must be no revanchism. We must pray together for all those that lost their lives regardless of which side they were on. We must be one nation and let the ballot box freely decide our future without threats or pressure.
Professor Oliver Antic said when the remains of your father were brought back that “President Nikolic is preparing the ground for the monarchy and that he is some kind of the substitute for the King at the moment”. How do you estimate Nikolic’s work as “the substitute for the King” and has Serbia moved an inch towards the restitution of monarchy? What do the advisory bodies of the Crown do about that?
My view is that our country would be well served by a constitutional monarchy of which there are many examples across the world. Our politicians would have one less post to contend with that has shown to create political jousting from time to time. But the problem is that many do not understand what constitutional parliamentary monarchy means, because there was so much propaganda against it. The monarch is not a member of a political party, he is not engaged in daily politics – he is a symbol of unity, stability and continuity. Travelling through Serbia, I saw a lot of interest in monarchy. People from all political parties are friendly, warm. In some places, the mayors from parties that are not monarchist, were the best hosts. But, one would have to ask President Nikolic what his views are. I would have thought the answer to perpetual power is to be prime minister after his potential second mandate as president comes to end. The prime minister can be elected many times providing re-election takes place. When I jokingly, mentioned this solution to Nikoliche replied: “Interesting”.
Has anyone in the East or West suggested the restoration of monarchy in Serbia to you?
Many people and even those who are not of monarchist persuasion see constitutional parliamentary monarchy as a good solution for Serbia and mention that it will provide a new desperately needed positive image for Serbia. No country is against it, including the Americans. But it is a matter of our internal policies.
Do politicians still see you as a competition, although you avoid making any political statements, even when it concerns state and national issues? Is such silence counter-productive for monarchist cause or is it a consequence of political relationships in Serbia?
It is possible that I am seen by some as competition and even envy due to my many international connections and friends. There is also a dilemma what to with me and my family since so far nothing has been solved, a human rights violation, and we are still living in confiscated properties that is a never ending issue and even a difficult situation for the government to resolve in a proper manner.
What seems to be the problem when it comes to the status of the Royal House?
To address this issue, there are examples in Bulgaria, Romania and Montenegro, which passed a special law.We talked about the new law, similar Montenegro’s, with Tadic’s and Dacic’s government. It was discussed last June, too, at a meeting with the Minister of Justice. The plan was to go through the Office of the Prime Minister, but there it stopped. We keep reminding them, but they say we should wait, because they have a lot of work –important people are coming, drones are coming, too…
With which government you have had the easiest and most productive relations since your first coming to Serbia in 1991, and your definitive return in 2001?
I did not have any contacts with the Milosevic regime, only with the DOS. I have been lucky to have had good relations with every government. There have been difficult moments and there is still much to be resolved and comes painfully slow. I am in full negotiations now and hope that something positive will come out of the talks. The Royal Compound is of historical importance and has beautiful priceless art, it is open to the public. Since it is still confiscated and for that matter so are all properties of my family, it is only fair that the maintenance and repairs are taken care of by the state in a proper budget. We are open to all the requests from the ministries and embassy for almost daily visitations. People love coming to visit The Royal Palace and the White Palace, they really enjoy our small Serbian Versailles. We try hard to keep the complex in good shape, but it is not easy. The current prime minister is very polite when we meet, but perhaps the government does not know how to solve our situation. I think that they are not against the Karadjordjevic family, but they do not know how to solve the question of the Palace maintenance budget, and how to preserve this monument.
Has the government profited from the royal funeral in Oplenac at last year?
Everyone has profited – my family and the people in power. The fact that the head of state made it possible for my father, the late King Peter, to return – was a sign of respect. It is very important that my mother, my grandmother and my uncle Prince Andrej “came back”, too. It brought together the whole family, and now, they all rest in peace in Oplenac, as King Peter King and Alexander wanted.
Has the state met all of its financial obligations in this regard?
Just last Friday afternoon, the money was paid. Previously the bills were settled in London, the Greek government assisted my mother, and now, finally, the transfer from the United Sates of my father and uncle has now been paid, too.
How do you evaluate the relations within the Royal House and are there any unhealthy ambitions among the members?
I have good relations with the majority of my relatives, but I am sad about some issues. All members of the family are free to come and many have stayed numerous times in the two palaces. It is of course important to be a united and happy family.
Why are you the only descendant of Queen Maria who didn’t ask for her rehabilitation, which is a legal requirement, as some people claim, for the restitution of assets to Karadjordjevic family, although only Prince Paul was convicted, before the WWII, because of the Tripartite Pact?
I am in full process following and reading all the never ending extraordinary demands and bureaucracy. There are appalling human right violations against me and my family that need to be resolved. What happened in 1947 was appalling and still has not been solved. We have recently received a letter from the Commission for Restitution, in which they say the rehabilitation of Prince Tomislav, Prince Andrej and me is required. I think the Commission is buying time.
How true is the impression that Princess Elizabeth has a “privileged” status with the current government – the remains of her father Prince Paul came to Serbia the first, although at that moment it was certain that the crowned members of the family would return as well, then he was buried, against the protocol of King Peter I, in the main church in Oplenac, and she was the first of the Karadjordjevics who got back the estate in Dedinje?
I am not aware of privileges, but rather the Princess case and that of her brother Prince Aleksandar being a much more easy and simpler one to solve than the rest of the Royal Family. I am very happy that her father, mother and brother “came back” and they were buried in Oplenac. It is good that the villa “Montenegrin” with surrounding estate was returned. I think she is not a problem for the government, while I might have been, so they do not sleep well.
I have not given up my right of king
I have never given up my rights, even though way back in1970, when my father, King Peter died, I decided not to use the title of the king – said Crown Prince Alexander. To the question of whether it was a good decision to educate his children out of Serbia, he responds that “Princes Peter, Philip and Alexander are here often and have helped the victims of the terrible floods”.
Broz and the Karadjordjevics
Is it a paradox that the probate hearings started by Josip Broz’s descendants opened the possibility for the Karadjordjevics to take part in looking for their assets?
I am certain with good will all issues can be solved in good time. This question needs to be carefully examined and ascertained. When we learned about the safe in the National Bank, I have officially requested, several times, that it should be opened, but I have never received the response. When Joska Broz requested the same, they immediately opened the vault. Although this was done two years ago. It is interesting that inside the safe, there are belongings of the members of the Royal Family. When the Romanoff’s safe was found in Sweden, it was decided to go on auction in order to avoid conflicts and debates. The family at the instigation of my cousin Princess Lavinia’s husband, Mr Austin Prichard-Levy, suggested to the government of Serbia that it would be a good solution here, too, but I have received no response. This solution would like the Romanoff safe avoid conflict.
Princess Diana also made clandestine visits to show kindness to terminally ill AIDS patients. According to nurses, she would turn up unannounced, for example, at the Mildmay Hospice in London, with specific instructions that these visits were to be concealed from the media.
Princess Diana and Landmines Campaign
Perhaps her most widely publicised charity appearance was her visit to Angola in January 1997, when, serving as an International Red Cross VIP volunteer [1], she visited landmine survivors in hospitals, toured de-mining projects run by the HALO Trust, and attended mine awareness education classes about the dangers of mines immediately surrounding homes and villages.
The pictures of Diana touring a minefield, in a ballistic helmet and flak jacket, were seen worldwide. (In fact, mine-clearance experts had already cleared the pre-planned walk that Diana took wearing the protective equipment.) In August that year, she visited Bosnia with the Landmine Survivors Network. Her interest in landmines was focused on the injuries they create, often to children, long after the conflict has finished.
She is widely acclaimed for her influence on the signing by the governments of the UK and other nations of the Ottawa Treaty in December 1997, after her death, which created an international ban on the use of anti-personnel landmines. Introducing the Second Reading of the Landmines Bill 1998 to the British House of Commons, the Foreign Secretary, Robin Cook, paid tribute to Diana’s work on landmines:
“All Honourable Members will be aware from their postbags of the immense contribution made by Diana, Princess of Wales to bringing home to many of our constituents the human costs of landmines. The best way in which to record our appreciation of her work, and the work of NGOs that have campaigned against landmines, is to pass the Bill, and to pave the way towards a global ban on landmines. “
As of January 2005, Diana’s legacy on landmines remained unfulfilled. The United Nations appealed to the nations which produced and stockpiled the largest numbers of landmines (China, India, North Korea, Pakistan, Russia and the United States) to sign the Ottawa Treaty forbidding their production and use, for which Diana had campaigned. Carol Bellamy, Executive Director of the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF), said that landmines remained “a deadly attraction for children, whose innate curiosity and need for play often lure them directly into harm’s way”.
Free Royalty Images Romantic Images With Quotes Of Love Of Couples With For Facebook Timeline For Girlfriend Of Lovers Of Hearts HD Photos
Free Royalty Images Romantic Images With Quotes Of Love Of Couples With For Facebook Timeline For Girlfriend Of Lovers Of Hearts HD Photos
Free Royalty Images Romantic Images With Quotes Of Love Of Couples With For Facebook Timeline For Girlfriend Of Lovers Of Hearts HD Photos
Free Royalty Images Romantic Images With Quotes Of Love Of Couples With For Facebook Timeline For Girlfriend Of Lovers Of Hearts HD Photos
Free Royalty Images Romantic Images With Quotes Of Love Of Couples With For Facebook Timeline For Girlfriend Of Lovers Of Hearts HD Photos
Free Royalty Images Romantic Images With Quotes Of Love Of Couples With For Facebook Timeline For Girlfriend Of Lovers Of Hearts HD Photos
Free Royalty Images Romantic Images With Quotes Of Love Of Couples With For Facebook Timeline For Girlfriend Of Lovers Of Hearts HD Photos
Free Royalty Images Romantic Images With Quotes Of Love Of Couples With For Facebook Timeline For Girlfriend Of Lovers Of Hearts HD Photos
Free Royalty Images Romantic Images With Quotes Of Love Of Couples With For Facebook Timeline For Girlfriend Of Lovers Of Hearts HD Photos
Free Royalty Images Romantic Images With Quotes Of Love Of Couples With For Facebook Timeline For Girlfriend Of Lovers Of Hearts HD Photos
Free Royalty Images Romantic Images With Quotes Of Love Of Couples With For Facebook Timeline For Girlfriend Of Lovers Of Hearts HD Photos
No comments:
Post a Comment